How to compare UK Foundation Schools

A practical framework for using geography, hospital locations and historic preference data without treating any single figure as the answer.

Start with geography, not a league table

A Foundation School is a regional training network rather than one hospital. Two schools with similar numbers of programmes can feel very different: one may be concentrated around a large city, while another may include coastal, rural, island or widely separated sites. Begin by identifying the full mapped footprint, then ask which parts of that footprint you would realistically be willing to live and work in.

The main map is designed for this first pass. Select a school to see its possible hospital sites together, then open the school guide to read the locations as a table. A marker shows a possible site associated with that school; it does not guarantee that the site will offer the same rotations, or any particular FY1 post, in every recruitment year.

Check the current programme list

Use the map as orientation, then verify your shortlist against the live Oriel programme information and the relevant Foundation School website. Programme names, rotations, employing organisations and available places can change. A hospital can appear in a regional training network without being available in every round, and some programmes include community, psychiatry, general practice or hospice placements that are not represented by an acute-hospital marker.

For each shortlisted school, check:

  • Which programme year and recruitment round the information describes.
  • Whether programmes are ranked school-wide or through an intermediate group or area.
  • Where each rotation is based, not only the employing trust’s headquarters.
  • Whether moving home or commuting between sites might be necessary.
  • Any linked-application, pre-allocation or local matching rules that apply to you.

Interpret first-preference ratios carefully

A first-preference ratio compares the number of applicants who ranked a school first with the number of programmes available at that stage. A ratio of 1.25 means 125 first-choice applicants for every 100 programmes; it does not mean that a particular applicant has a 25% chance of missing out.

Ratios describe a completed allocation round. They can move substantially from year to year as applicant preferences, programme numbers and allocation arrangements change. Use the 2024–2026 table to understand whether demand has been consistently high, consistently below one applicant per place, or variable. Do not convert historic ratios into a personal probability or assume that last year’s ordering will repeat.

Think about daily life around the programme

Once a school remains on your shortlist, compare the questions that affect you personally: housing options, transport, proximity to support networks, willingness to drive, and comfort with urban, coastal, rural or island placements. Straight-line map distance is useful for understanding scale, but it is not a commute estimate. Roads, public transport, shift times and cross-city travel can make two apparently close sites very different in practice.

If a school contains several hospitals in one locality, that may suggest a more concentrated footprint, but rotations can still move between organisations. If locations are dispersed, investigate whether programmes are grouped geographically and whether accommodation or relocation support is available from the official employer.

Build a defensible shortlist

  1. Remove schools whose full geography would be unacceptable to you.
  2. Open the remaining school pages and note the principal clusters and outlying sites.
  3. Check current Oriel programmes and official local guidance.
  4. Use historic ratios as context, not as the sole reason to move a school up or down.
  5. Record the source and date for any fact that materially affects your decision.
  6. Recheck your final list shortly before the relevant ranking deadline.